Liberating Community-based Research: Rescuing Gramsci’s Legacy of Organic Intellectuals

Authors

  • José Wellington Sousa University of Regina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v8i3.70755

Keywords:

organic intellectuals, adult education, community-based research facilitation

Abstract

This article aims to provoke a discussion around conceiving community members as community-based research facilitators and leaders of their own process of change. It argues this is possible by rescuing Gramsci’s legacy of organic intellectuals that is present in community-based research literature, particularly under the participatory research rubric. However, this perspective has been overshadowed by a strong emphasis on community-based research (CBR) as a collaborative research approach rather than a people’s approach for knowledge production that leads to social transformation. Furthermore, such a view of community-based research is fruitful within an adult education and social movement learning framework. In a sense, social movements provide an environment that facilitates critical consciousness and the formation of organic intellectuals and in which communities and academics learn to better engage in partnership for community-led social change. In this context, CBR is still a collaborative approach, but one led primarily by organic intellectuals. 

Author Biography

  • José Wellington Sousa, University of Regina

    is an emerging community development scholar placed in Canada. He is an assistant professor at Crandall University and a PhD candidate in Adult Education and Community Engagement at the University of Regina. His current research interests include asset-based and community-led development, community-based research facilitators and facilitation. 

References

Ander-Erg, E. (2003). Repensando la investigación acción-participatica (4th ed.). Grupo Editorial Lumen-Hvmanitas.

Arribas Lozano, A. (2018). Knowledge co-production with social movement networks: Redefining grassroots politics, rethinking research. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1457521

Beck, D., & Purcell, R. (2020). Community development for social change. Routledge.

Boggs, C. (2010). Gramsci and the New American Movement. Works and Days, 28(55-56), 147-156.

Bowd, R., Ozerdem, A., & Kassa, D. (2010). A theoretical and practical exposition of “participatory” research methods. In A. Ozerden & R. Bowd (Eds.), Participatory research methodologies: Development and post-disaster/conflict reconstruction (pp. 3-18). Taylor & Francis Group.

Caraballo, L., Lozenski, B., Lyiscott, J., & Morrell, E. (2017). Youth participatory action research (YPAR) and critical epistemologies: Rethinking educational research. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686948

Cassidy, K. (2008). Organic intellectuals and the new loyalism: Re-inventing protestant working class politics in Northern Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 23(3), 411-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907180802246743

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Intermediate Technology Publication.

Clover, D., & Craig, C. (2009). Streets-life’s creative turn: An exploration of arts-based adult education and knowledge mobilization with Homeless/Street involved women in Victoria. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 22(1), 21-35.

De Nardis, F., & Caruso, L. (2011). Political crisis and social transformation in Antonio Gramsci: Elements for a sociology of political praxis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(6), 13-23.

Diaz-Puentes, J., Gallego, F., Vidueira, P., & Fernandez, M. (2014). Facilitation in community development. Twenty-five years of experience in rural territories in Cuenca, Spain. European Planning Studies, 22(11), 2231-2247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.830695

English, L. M., & Mayo, P. (2012). Learning with adults: A critical pedagogical introduction. Sense Publishers.

English, L., & Irving, C. (2015). Feminism and adult education: The nexus of policy, practice, and payment. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 27(2), 1-15.

Etmanski, C., Dawson, T., & Hall, B. (2014). Introduction. In C. Etmanski, B. Hall & T. Dawson (Eds.), Learning and teaching community-based research: Linking pedagogy to practice (pp.3-22). University of Toronto Press.

Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Fals Borda, O. (1992). La ciencia y el pueblo: Nuevas reflexiones. In M. Salazar (Ed.), La investigación-acción participativa: Inicios y desarrollos (pp. 59-75). Editorial Popular.

Femia, J. (1975). Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of Antonio Gramsci. Political Studies, 23(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00044.x

Fischman, G., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical pedagogy and the Gramscian and Freirean legacies: From organic to committed intellectuals or critical pedagogy, commitment, and praxis. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 5(4), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605279701

Forgacs, D. (Ed.). (2000). The Gramsci reader: Selected writing 1916-1935. New York University Press.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. P. (1995). A dialogue: Culture, language, and race. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.3.12g1923330p1xhj8

Gaventa, J. (1993). The powerful, the powerless, and the expert: Knowledge struggles in an information age. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 21-40). Bergin & Garvey.

Gencarella, S. (2010). Gramsci, good sense, and critical folklore studies. Journal of Folklore Research, 47(3), 221-252. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.2010.47.3.221

Grace, A. P. (2013). Lifelong learning as critical action: International perspectives on people, politics, policy, and practice. Canada Scholar’s Press Inc.

Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (1st ed.). International Publishers.

Green, M. (2011). Gramsci cannot speak: Presentation and interpretations of Gramsci’s concept of the subaltern. In M. Green (Ed.), Rethinking Gramsci (pp. 68-89). Routledge.

Hall, B. (1981). Participatory research, popular knowledge and power: A personal reflection. Convergence, 14(3), 6-17.

Hall, B. (1993). Introduction. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. xiii-xxii). Bergin & Garvey.

Hall, B. (2005). In from the cold? Reflections on participatory research from 1970-2005. Convergence, 38(1), 5-24.

Hall, B., & Clover, D. (2005). Social movement learning. In L. English (Ed.), International encyclopedia of adult education (pp. 584-589). Palgrave Macmillan.

Hall, B., & Clover, D. (2014). Imagine/learning: Thoughts from two adult educators. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 26(2), 1-8.

Hall, B., Tandon, R., Lepore, W., Singh, W., Easby, A., & Tremblay, C. (2016). Theoretical pedagogical framework for community-based research. In R. Tandon, B. Hall, W. Lepore & W. Singh (Eds.), Knowledge and engagement: Building capacity for the next generation of community-based researchers (pp. 7-38). PRIA.

Hamilton, E. (1992). Adult education for community development. Greenwood Press.

Hawley, J. (1980). Antonio Gramsci’s Marxism: Class, state and work. Social Problems, 27(5), 584-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/800198

Hoare, Q. & Smith, G. N. (Eds.)(1971). Introduction. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (pp. 1-4). International Publishers.

Hoare, G., & Sperber, N. (2016). Introduction to Antonio Gramsci: His life, thought and legacy. Bloomsbury.

Kapoor, I. (2010). The devil’s in the theory: A critical assessment of Robert Chambers’ work on participatory development. The Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 1011-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590220108199

Korff, R., & Rothfuss, E. (2011). From action to participatory research: Critical and affirmative implications of a research method (Contemporary Southeast Asian Dynamics, Working Paper Series No.3). University of Passau.

Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for community participation. Practical Action Publishing.

Ledwith, M. (2011). Community development: Critical approach (2nd ed.). Policy Press.

Ledwith, M. (2016). Community development in action: Putting Freire into practice. Policy Press.

Ledwith, M. (2020). Community development: A critical and radical approach (3rd ed.). Policy Press.

Lenin, V. (1902). What is to be done? Marxists Internet Archive.

Mayo, P. (1999). Gramsci, Freire and adult education: Possibilities for transformative action. Zed Books.

Mayo, P. (2015). Hegemony and education under neoliberalism Insights from Gramsci. Routledge.

Moreland, R., & Lovett, T. (1997). Lifelong learning and community development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 16(3), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137970160304

Morris, R. (2005). Social movements. In L. English (Ed.), International encyclopedia of adult education

(pp. 589-594). Palgrave Macmillan.

Morrison, C., & Sacchetto, D. (2018). Research ethics in an unethical world: The politics and morality or engaged research. Work, Employment and Society, 32(6), 1118-1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017726947

Negri, B., Thomas, E., Ilinigumugabo, A., Muvandi, I., & Lewis, G. (1998). Empowering communities: Participatory techniques for community-based programme development (Vol. 2). Centre for African Family Studies, Nairobi.

Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2015). Theories of development: Contentions, arguments, alternatives (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Purcell, R. (2005). Working in the community: Perspectives for change (2nd ed.). Lulu Press.

Pyrch, T. (2012). Breaking free: A facilitators’ guide to participatory action research practice. Lulu Press.

Rahman, M. A. (1991). The theoretical standpoint of PAR. In O. Fals-Borda & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research (pp. 13-23). The Apex Press.

Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2008). Community organizing and development (4th ed.). Pearson.

Selener, D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change (2nd ed.). Cornell University.

Stewart, P., & Lucio, M. (2017). Research, participation and the neo-liberal context: The challenges of emergent participatory and emancipatory research approaches. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 17(3), 533-556.

Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-based research and higher education: Principles and practices. Jossey-Bass.

Sumner, J. (2005). Sustainability and the civil commons: Rural communities in the age of globalization. University of Toronto Press.

Vio Grossi, F. (1981). Socio-political implications of participatory research. Convergence, 14(3), 43-51.

Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2008). The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed., pp. 25-46). Jossey-Bass.

Walton, D. (2012). Doing cultural theory. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Welton, M. (1995). Amateurs out to change the world: A retrospective on community development. Convergence, 28(2), 49-62.

Welton, M. (2013). Unearthing Canada’s hidden past: A short history of adult education. Thompson Publishing.

Westoby, P., & Shevellar, L. (2016). A perspective on community-based education and training. In P. Westoby & L. Shevellar (Eds.), Learning and mobilizing for community development: A radical tradition of community-based education and training (pp. 13-23). Routledge.

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

Liberating Community-based Research: Rescuing Gramsci’s Legacy of Organic Intellectuals. (2022). Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning, 8(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v8i3.70755

Similar Articles

1-10 of 240

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.